G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
317.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 322.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.

Quadro P5000

2016

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 322.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
317.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 64 better than Quadro P5000?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,891 vs 12,728 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a 2017 card with FSR upscaling, while Quadro P5000 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P5000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 16 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro Vega 64 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $599 MSRP. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is about $1,900 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P5000 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (180W vs 250W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro P5000 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 64?

Yes. Quadro P5000 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (180W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $2,499 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Vega 64. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Vega 64 currently gives you 1.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 322.5%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P5000 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 64 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	252 FPS	106 FPS
medium	240 FPS	96 FPS
high	210 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	232 FPS	94 FPS
medium	195 FPS	81 FPS
high	162 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	128 FPS	47 FPS
medium	108 FPS	42 FPS
high	85 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	29 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	274 FPS	301 FPS
medium	231 FPS	262 FPS
high	171 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	180 FPS	204 FPS
medium	153 FPS	175 FPS
high	122 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	100 FPS
medium	87 FPS	84 FPS
high	71 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	573 FPS	580 FPS
medium	458 FPS	464 FPS
high	382 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	286 FPS	290 FPS
1440p
low	430 FPS	435 FPS
medium	344 FPS	348 FPS
high	286 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	286 FPS	290 FPS
medium	229 FPS	232 FPS
high	191 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	145 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	442 FPS	300 FPS
medium	373 FPS	247 FPS
high	310 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	260 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	356 FPS	220 FPS
medium	300 FPS	182 FPS
high	236 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	122 FPS
4K
low	192 FPS	132 FPS
medium	151 FPS	118 FPS
high	136 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	79 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon Pro Vega 64

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
G3D Mark Score	12,728	12,891+1%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 5.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048	4096+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	11.06 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+28%	1350 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160	256+60%
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	1 MB+6%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.0	1.1+10%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).

Feature	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro P5000	Radeon Pro Vega 64
TDP	180W-28%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	70.7+37%	51.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 76% less ($1900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 321.6% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).