
Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 580
2017T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 580 better than T1000 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T1000 8GB make more sense than Radeon Pro 580?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and T1000 8GB

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

T1000 8GB
T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the T1000 8GB reaches 7,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T1000 8GB uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 896 (T1000 8GB). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753+1% | 7,674 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+121% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1395 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 896 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580) vs 1 MB (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon Pro 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 100% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 156mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7 | 153.5+197% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP, while the T1000 8GB launched at $500. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 15.3 (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 1.3% better value. The T1000 8GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5+1% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | TU117 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #327 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












