
Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅46.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅46.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 780 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and Radeon RX 780

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753+1% | 7,658 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+549% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2335 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 768 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7+22% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. The Radeon RX 780 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 1.3% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5+1% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Navi 32 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #327 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












