
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌829% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+30.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,230 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1110.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅+30.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,230 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1110.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌829% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon RX 7600

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 30.3%. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 16,581+30% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+145% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2655 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 8.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 165W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 100.5+42% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 89.2% less ($2230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 1107.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $269-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 61.6+1108% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #206 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












