
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 960M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 960M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 960M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 960M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960M better than Radeon RX 560X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 560X make more sense than GeForce GTX 960M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon RX 560X

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375+1% | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.505 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1275 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 960M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the GeForce GTX 960M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0+1% | 44.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $129 |
| Codename | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #552 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












