
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD8970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960M better than Radeon HD8970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD8970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon HD8970M

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Radeon HD8970M
Radeon HD8970M
The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Radeon HD8970M reaches 3,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375 | 3,369 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.505 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+31% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD8970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD8970M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) — the GeForce GTX 960M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD8970M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 960M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Radeon HD8970M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0+34% | 33.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












