GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960M

2015Core: 1096 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1098 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 960M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quadro M2000M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M2000M better than GeForce GTX 960M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,375 vs 3,410 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro M2000M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (55W vs 75W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 960M is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro M2000M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro M2000M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro M2000M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 960M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX 960M make more sense than Quadro M2000M?
Yes. GeForce GTX 960M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro M2000M. The trade-off is that Quadro M2000M currently gives you 1.0% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
1080p
low27 FPS33 FPS
medium17 FPS21 FPS
high11 FPS13 FPS
ultra6 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low13 FPS16 FPS
medium7 FPS9 FPS
high4 FPS4 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low5 FPS5 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
1080p
low79 FPS81 FPS
medium49 FPS50 FPS
high37 FPS37 FPS
ultra22 FPS22 FPS
1440p
low37 FPS37 FPS
medium27 FPS27 FPS
high17 FPS17 FPS
ultra12 FPS11 FPS
4K
low12 FPS12 FPS
medium10 FPS9 FPS
high8 FPS8 FPS
ultra5 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
1080p
low152 FPS153 FPS
medium122 FPS123 FPS
high101 FPS102 FPS
ultra76 FPS77 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS115 FPS
medium91 FPS92 FPS
high76 FPS77 FPS
ultra57 FPS58 FPS
4K
low76 FPS77 FPS
medium61 FPS61 FPS
high51 FPS51 FPS
ultra38 FPS38 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
1080p
low152 FPS153 FPS
medium121 FPS123 FPS
high101 FPS102 FPS
ultra76 FPS77 FPS
1440p
low111 FPS115 FPS
medium91 FPS92 FPS
high76 FPS77 FPS
ultra57 FPS58 FPS
4K
low63 FPS71 FPS
medium49 FPS56 FPS
high38 FPS46 FPS
ultra30 FPS35 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960M

The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Quadro M2000M reaches 3,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M2000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 640 (Quadro M2000M). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1098 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
G3D Mark Score
3,375
3,410+1%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.505 TFLOPS+7%
1.405 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1176 MHz+7%
1098 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M2000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
Encoder
NVENC (4th Gen)
4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
NVDEC (1st Gen)
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Quadro M2000M's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Quadro M2000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960MQuadro M2000M
TDP
75W
55W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
82
80°C-2%
Perf/Watt
45.0
62.0+38%