
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

Radeon E8870PCIe
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.
Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960M better than Radeon E8870PCIe?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon E8870PCIe still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon E8870PCIe

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Radeon E8870PCIe
Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 625 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375 | 3,368 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.505 TFLOPS+88% | 0.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+88% | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon E8870PCIe relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 960M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 37W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0 | 91.0+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Codename | GM107 | Venus |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #552 | #734 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












