
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 960M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 960M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 960M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 960M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500M better than GeForce GTX 960M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon Pro W5500M

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375 | 3,470+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1408+120% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.505 TFLOPS | 4.083 TFLOPS+171% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1450 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 88+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (4th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (1st Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 960M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0+10% | 40.8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












