
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

Quadro P600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960M better than Quadro P600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P600 make more sense than GeForce GTX 960M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Quadro P600

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Quadro P600
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 384 (Quadro P600). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1620 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375+2% | 3,318 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.505 TFLOPS+21% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1620 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+122% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1 MB (Quadro P600) — the GeForce GTX 960M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (4th Gen) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (1st Gen) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 40W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0 | 83.0+84% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GM107 | GP107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #552 | #558 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












