
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,375 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+415.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+415.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,375 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 960M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 64 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 783 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 196 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 17,400 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 415.6%. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375 | 17,400+416% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 4352+580% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.505 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+1366% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 2535 MHz+116% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 136+240% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 4.3 MB+1287% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 960M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 960M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (4th Gen) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (1st Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 960M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 80°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0 | 108.8+142% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












