
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅50.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 780
2013GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅50.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 77.4%. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 14,114+77% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+20% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1680 MHz+87% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+60% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1.9 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 780 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 160W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 72-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 88.2+177% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 30.1% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 154.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $349-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 40.4+154% |
| Codename | GK110 | TU106 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #320 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













