
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅34.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 780
2013GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅34.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 26.5%. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 10,064+26% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1733 MHz+93% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 960 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+50% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 400W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 55.9+76% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 154.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $249-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 40.4+154% |
| Codename | GK110 | GP104 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #320 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













