GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon Pro 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 192.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 460 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌282.9% higher power demand at 134W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

✅36.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 35W instead of 134W, a 99W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
195.9% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 192.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅36.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 35W instead of 134W, a 99W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 460 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌282.9% higher power demand at 134W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
195.9% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 460 better than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST?

Yes. Radeon Pro 460 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 36.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.1% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2013, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 460 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro 460 is about 195.9% more expensive on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 36.5% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST make more sense than Radeon Pro 460?

Yes. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 460. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 460 currently gives you 1.1% higher G3D Mark and 36.5% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 460 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
1080p
low	31 FPS	36 FPS
medium	20 FPS	22 FPS
high	14 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	24 FPS	24 FPS
medium	14 FPS	14 FPS
high	7 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	9 FPS	9 FPS
medium	6 FPS	6 FPS
high	3 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open Radeon Pro 460

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
1080p
low	43 FPS	73 FPS
medium	20 FPS	45 FPS
high	15 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	19 FPS
1440p
low	22 FPS	35 FPS
medium	9 FPS	23 FPS
high	7 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	7 FPS	10 FPS
medium	4 FPS	7 FPS
high	3 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open Radeon Pro 460

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
1080p
low	154 FPS	155 FPS
medium	123 FPS	124 FPS
high	102 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	115 FPS	117 FPS
medium	92 FPS	93 FPS
high	77 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	78 FPS
medium	61 FPS	62 FPS
high	51 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open Radeon Pro 460

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
1080p
low	133 FPS	138 FPS
medium	96 FPS	107 FPS
high	75 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	78 FPS	100 FPS
medium	57 FPS	79 FPS
high	48 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	59 FPS
medium	29 FPS	45 FPS
high	24 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open Radeon Pro 460

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Radeon Pro 460

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
G3D Mark Score	3,415	3,453+1%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.585 TFLOPS	1.858 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz+14%	907 MHz
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	64 KB	256 KB+300%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 460 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 117.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	Radeon Pro 460
TDP	134W	35W-74%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	97°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.5	98.7+287%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 66.2% less ($331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 192.8% better value. The Radeon Pro 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).