
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌12.7% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌346.7% higher power demand at 134W vs 30W.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 134W, a 104W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 134W, a 104W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌12.7% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌346.7% higher power demand at 134W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) better than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST make more sense than Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415 | 3,500+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+4% | 993 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)'s 30W — a 126.8% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 30W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | 75-23% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 116.7+358% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 MSRP, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) launched at $150. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) costs 11.2% less ($19 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 23.3 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) — the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) offers 15.3% better value. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $150-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 23.3+15% |
| Codename | GK106 | Surface Book |
| Release | March 26 2013 | October 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #551 | #782 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














