
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:

Radeon HD8970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD8970M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌34% higher power demand at 134W vs 100W.
Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅57.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 134W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅57.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 134W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD8970M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌34% higher power demand at 134W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST better than Radeon HD8970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD8970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Radeon HD8970M

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

Radeon HD8970M
Radeon HD8970M
The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon HD8970M reaches 3,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415+1% | 3,369 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.585 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+15% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 320 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD8970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD8970M) — the Radeon HD8970M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon HD8970M's 100W — a 29.1% difference. The Radeon HD8970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon HD8970M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 100W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 33.7+32% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













