GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011Core: 715 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 303.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 168% higher power demand at 134W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

  • 27.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 50W instead of 134W, a 84W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 313.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire better than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST?
Yes. Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 27.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.5% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2011 instead of 2013, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is about 313.6% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 27.0% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST make more sense than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire?
Yes. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire currently gives you 2.5% higher G3D Mark and 27.0% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low31 FPS37 FPS
medium20 FPS30 FPS
high14 FPS21 FPS
ultra8 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low24 FPS29 FPS
medium14 FPS21 FPS
high7 FPS13 FPS
ultra4 FPS8 FPS
4K
low9 FPS11 FPS
medium6 FPS9 FPS
high3 FPS6 FPS
ultra2 FPS5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low43 FPS66 FPS
medium20 FPS44 FPS
high15 FPS32 FPS
ultra10 FPS21 FPS
1440p
low22 FPS37 FPS
medium9 FPS21 FPS
high7 FPS15 FPS
ultra5 FPS11 FPS
4K
low7 FPS13 FPS
medium4 FPS8 FPS
high3 FPS6 FPS
ultra2 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low154 FPS158 FPS
medium123 FPS126 FPS
high102 FPS105 FPS
ultra77 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low115 FPS118 FPS
medium92 FPS94 FPS
high77 FPS79 FPS
ultra58 FPS59 FPS
4K
low77 FPS79 FPS
medium61 FPS63 FPS
high51 FPS52 FPS
ultra38 FPS39 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low133 FPS118 FPS
medium96 FPS90 FPS
high75 FPS61 FPS
ultra56 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low78 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS51 FPS
high48 FPS37 FPS
ultra34 FPS26 FPS
4K
low42 FPS38 FPS
medium29 FPS26 FPS
high24 FPS19 FPS
ultra16 FPS13 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score
3,415
3,500+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Terascale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768
2240+192%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.1
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
None
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 91.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 90.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
TDP
134W
50W-63%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
97°C
90-7%
Perf/Watt
25.5
70.0+175%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 75.8% less ($530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 5.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 304% better value. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOSTRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP
$169-76%
$699
Performance per Dollar
20.2+304%
5.0
Codename
GK106
Blackcomb XTX
Release
March 26 2013
July 12 2011
Ranking
#551
#517