
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 303.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌168% higher power demand at 134W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅27.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 134W, a 84W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌313.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 303.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅27.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 134W, a 84W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌168% higher power demand at 134W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌313.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire better than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST make more sense than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,415 | 3,500+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2240+192% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 91.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 90.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 134W | 50W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | 90-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 70.0+175% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 75.8% less ($530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 5.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 304% better value. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-76% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2+304% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GK106 | Blackcomb XTX |
| Release | March 26 2013 | July 12 2011 |
| Ranking | #551 | #517 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













