G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 134W instead of 180W, a 46W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅283.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌34.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 134W.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 134W instead of 180W, a 46W reduction.

Why buy it

✅283.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌34.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 134W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1060 averages 283.4% more FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 3,415 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013, 194.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 47.3% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 283.4% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 194.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 3,415 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low	31 FPS	117 FPS
medium	20 FPS	105 FPS
high	14 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	77 FPS
1440p
low	24 FPS	103 FPS
medium	14 FPS	87 FPS
high	7 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	9 FPS	55 FPS
medium	6 FPS	49 FPS
high	3 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open GeForce GTX 1060

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low	43 FPS	216 FPS
medium	20 FPS	181 FPS
high	15 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	22 FPS	134 FPS
medium	9 FPS	107 FPS
high	7 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	7 FPS	62 FPS
medium	4 FPS	51 FPS
high	3 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open GeForce GTX 1060

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low	154 FPS	453 FPS
medium	123 FPS	362 FPS
high	102 FPS	302 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	115 FPS	340 FPS
medium	92 FPS	272 FPS
high	77 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	170 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	226 FPS
medium	61 FPS	181 FPS
high	51 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	113 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open GeForce GTX 1060

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low	133 FPS	358 FPS
medium	96 FPS	302 FPS
high	75 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	78 FPS	299 FPS
medium	57 FPS	254 FPS
high	48 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	170 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	170 FPS
medium	29 FPS	133 FPS
high	24 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	102 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Open GeForce GTX 1060

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST scores 3,415 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 194.7%. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score	3,415	10,064+195%
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.585 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS+460%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1733 MHz+68%
ROPs	24	64+167%
TMUs	64	160+150%
L1 Cache	64 KB	960 KB+1400%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2 MB+426%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	192 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2 MB+426%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.4	4.5+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST draws 134W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST	GeForce GTX 1060
TDP	134W-26%	180W
Recommended PSU	450W	400W-11%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	6-pin
Length	241mm	173mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	97°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.5	55.9+119%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 32.1% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).