PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Why buy it

✅+112.5% higher PassMark.
✅+2300% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,599 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Delivers 604.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 47,665).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9184X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅+112.5% higher PassMark.
✅+2300% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,599 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Delivers 604.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 47,665).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9184X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 9184X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9184X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9184X is the better fit. You are getting 112.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 2300% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $4,599 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $4,928 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9184X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 112.5% better PassMark. It is also 604.9% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9184X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 2300% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9184X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	169 FPS	200 FPS
medium	138 FPS	163 FPS
high	118 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	156 FPS
medium	119 FPS	121 FPS
high	96 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	84 FPS
medium	59 FPS	71 FPS
high	47 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	576 FPS	561 FPS
medium	504 FPS	525 FPS
high	409 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	484 FPS	545 FPS
medium	431 FPS	471 FPS
high	360 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	350 FPS
medium	271 FPS	304 FPS
high	244 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	219 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	746 FPS	561 FPS
medium	632 FPS	561 FPS
high	575 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	557 FPS	561 FPS
medium	470 FPS	561 FPS
high	420 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	499 FPS
medium	321 FPS	394 FPS
high	284 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	958 FPS	561 FPS
medium	867 FPS	561 FPS
high	738 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	653 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	754 FPS	561 FPS
medium	657 FPS	561 FPS
high	556 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	481 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	534 FPS	561 FPS
medium	477 FPS	501 FPS
high	420 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	359 FPS	396 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9184X and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 9184X

The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9184X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 72% lead for the EPYC 9184X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.55 GHz	3.6 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+2300%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	47,665+113%	22,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9184X versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9184X supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9184X) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9184X offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	128 GB+2184433%
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

Feature	EPYC 9184X	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9184X launched at $4928 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($4928 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $4599 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 150.3% better value option.