
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6542Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,361 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6542Y needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6542Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,144 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Xeon Gold 6542Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,361 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6542Y needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,144 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon Gold 6542Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 365 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 965 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 863 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 747 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 785 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 685 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Xeon Gold 6542Y

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Gold 6542Y
Xeon Gold 6542Y
The Xeon Gold 6542Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,144 points. Launch price was $2,878.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6542Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6542Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6542Y — a 32.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6542Y uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon Gold 6542Y's 60,144 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6542Y.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+39% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 60,144 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6542Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6542Y — the EPYC 4584PX supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6542Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6542Y). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6542Y) — the Xeon Gold 6542Y offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6542Y).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+8% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6542Y). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6542Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon Gold 6542Y rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6542Y debuted at $2878. On MSRP ($1517 vs $2878), the EPYC 4584PX is $1361 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 20.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6542Y — making the EPYC 4584PX the 62% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6542Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-47% | $2878 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+90% | 20.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













