EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon 6710E

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4584PX

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6710E

64 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 4584PX

16 / 32

60,169

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 8945HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6710E

64 / 64

61,404

+2.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6710E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,404).

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
❌
3.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,565 MSRPvs$1,517 MSRP
❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6710E needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,404).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
❌
3.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,565 MSRPvs$1,517 MSRP
❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon 6710E?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 4584PX is ahead with a 41.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6710E pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark. EPYC 4584PX also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6710E is the better fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4584PX is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4584PX is $48 cheaper on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $1,565 MSRP, and it gives you a 41.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6710E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.1% better PassMark. It is also 1.1% better value on MSRP (39.7 vs 39.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6710E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 64 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4584PX Benchmark Check

Xeon 6710E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	290 FPS	189 FPS
medium	264 FPS	152 FPS
high	219 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	274 FPS	153 FPS
medium	227 FPS	119 FPS
high	176 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	189 FPS	71 FPS
medium	155 FPS	59 FPS
high	119 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	38 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon 6710E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	701 FPS	437 FPS
medium	599 FPS	378 FPS
high	444 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	241 FPS
1440p
low	574 FPS	359 FPS
medium	511 FPS	319 FPS
high	394 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	323 FPS	222 FPS
medium	291 FPS	201 FPS
high	256 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	135 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon 6710E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	1025 FPS	934 FPS
medium	1166 FPS	831 FPS
high	1102 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	972 FPS	746 FPS
medium	879 FPS	655 FPS
high	806 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	546 FPS
4K
low	597 FPS	479 FPS
medium	519 FPS	378 FPS
high	466 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	272 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon 6710E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	1303 FPS	918 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	830 FPS
high	993 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	865 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	1035 FPS	710 FPS
medium	897 FPS	620 FPS
high	772 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	450 FPS
4K
low	759 FPS	509 FPS
medium	662 FPS	455 FPS
high	577 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	344 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon 6710E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Xeon 6710E

EPYC 4584PX

The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon 6710E

The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6710E offers 64 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E — a 56.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6710E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon 6710E's 61,404 — a 2% lead for the Xeon 6710E. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E.

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	64 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+78%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+75%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+33%	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB (per module)+300%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	60,169	61,404+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,225
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,400

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6710E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E — the EPYC 4584PX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon 6710E). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 88 (Xeon 6710E) — the Xeon 6710E offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C741 (Xeon 6710E).

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
Socket	AM5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200+103900%	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	256	4096 GB+1677721500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	88+214%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6710E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534.

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon 6710E
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Efficiency Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon 6710E debuted at $1565. On MSRP ($1517 vs $1565), the EPYC 4584PX is $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 39.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6710E — making the EPYC 4584PX the 1.1% better value option.