
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

EPYC 7473X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,383 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 240W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 7473X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,280 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 240W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
EPYC 4584PX
2024EPYC 7473X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,383 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 240W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,280 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 240W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than EPYC 7473X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 187 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 668 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 994 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 902 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 777 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 670 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and EPYC 7473X

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X
The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7473X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7473X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X — a 42.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7473X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the EPYC 7473X's 59,280 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+54% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+50% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Milan-X (2022) |
| PassMark | 60,169+1% | 59,280 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7473X uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7473X — the EPYC 4584PX supports 47.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7473X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (EPYC 7473X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 128 (EPYC 7473X) — the EPYC 7473X offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and SP3 (EPYC 7473X).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7473X). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7473X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the EPYC 7473X debuted at $3900. On MSRP ($1517 vs $3900), the EPYC 4584PX is $2383 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7473X — making the EPYC 4584PX the 89.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-61% | $3900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+161% | 15.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













