
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,578).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $768 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 107.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $768 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 107.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,578).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than EPYC 4584PX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 1080 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 976 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 768 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 753 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 5.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+6% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+68% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 61,578+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 7.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4584PX supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 96 — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | 5600+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256+167% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4584PX) and AMD Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D debuted at $749. On MSRP ($1517 vs $749), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is $768 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 69.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $749-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 82.2+107% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












