EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon 6520P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6520P

24 Cores48 Thrd210 WWMax: 4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 75F3

32 / 64

64,505

+0.8%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6520P

24 / 48

64,010

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6520P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6520P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,088 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,010 vs 64,505).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 75F3

2021

Xeon 6520P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,088 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6520P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,010 vs 64,505).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6520P better than EPYC 75F3?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon 6520P is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. EPYC 75F3 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6520P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6520P is $4,088 cheaper on MSRP at $1,295 MSRP versus $5,383 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 75F3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 312.5% better value on MSRP (49.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6520P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 75F3 Benchmark Check

Xeon 6520P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
1080p
low	198 FPS	188 FPS
medium	161 FPS	165 FPS
high	130 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	155 FPS
medium	126 FPS	131 FPS
high	98 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	70 FPS
medium	61 FPS	63 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon 6520P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
1080p
low	507 FPS	520 FPS
medium	443 FPS	460 FPS
high	354 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	425 FPS
medium	373 FPS	383 FPS
high	308 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	262 FPS
medium	234 FPS	239 FPS
high	205 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon 6520P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
1080p
low	948 FPS	910 FPS
medium	792 FPS	838 FPS
high	734 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	657 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	661 FPS	782 FPS
medium	552 FPS	716 FPS
high	503 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	472 FPS	528 FPS
medium	374 FPS	444 FPS
high	330 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon 6520P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
1080p
low	1006 FPS	983 FPS
medium	908 FPS	887 FPS
high	782 FPS	767 FPS
ultra	679 FPS	666 FPS
1440p
low	770 FPS	803 FPS
medium	671 FPS	700 FPS
high	575 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	500 FPS	519 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	579 FPS
medium	495 FPS	521 FPS
high	435 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	398 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon 6520P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and Xeon 6520P

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

Xeon 6520P

The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+23%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+78%	144 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	64,505	64,010
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200+63900%	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4 TB+104857500%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6520P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the Xeon 6520P debuted at $1295. On MSRP ($5383 vs $1295), the Xeon 6520P is $4088 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Xeon 6520P the 121.9% better value option.