PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 65,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $2,393 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 75F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 75F3

2021

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $2,393 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 65,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 75F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9334 better than EPYC 75F3?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 75F3 is ahead with a 20.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 75F3 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9334 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9334 is $2,393 cheaper on MSRP at $2,990 MSRP versus $5,383 MSRP, and it gives you 1.6% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 75F3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 83.0% better value on MSRP (21.9 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 75F3 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	198 FPS	170 FPS
medium	161 FPS	141 FPS
high	130 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	148 FPS
medium	126 FPS	120 FPS
high	98 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	70 FPS
medium	61 FPS	59 FPS
high	47 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 9334

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	507 FPS	533 FPS
medium	443 FPS	465 FPS
high	354 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	438 FPS
medium	373 FPS	392 FPS
high	308 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	270 FPS
medium	234 FPS	246 FPS
high	205 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	179 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 9334

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	948 FPS	646 FPS
medium	792 FPS	538 FPS
high	734 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	657 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	661 FPS	502 FPS
medium	552 FPS	417 FPS
high	503 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	472 FPS	374 FPS
medium	374 FPS	291 FPS
high	330 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 9334

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	1006 FPS	856 FPS
medium	908 FPS	786 FPS
high	782 FPS	678 FPS
ultra	679 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	770 FPS	689 FPS
medium	671 FPS	605 FPS
high	575 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	500 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	494 FPS
medium	495 FPS	445 FPS
high	435 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	336 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 9334

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9334

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9334 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	4 GHz+3%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+9%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	64,505	65,568+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9334 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($5383 vs $2990), the EPYC 9334 is $2393 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the EPYC 9334 the 58.7% better value option.