EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon w7-2595X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon w7-2595X

26 Cores52 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 75F3

32 / 64

64,505

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-2595X

26 / 52

66,049

+2.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+425.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 49 MB).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 66,049).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-2595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,344 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 75F3

2021

Xeon w7-2595X

2024

Why buy it

✅+425.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 49 MB).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,344 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 66,049).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2595X better than EPYC 75F3?

Yes. Xeon w7-2595X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 32.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-2595X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2595X is the better fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 26 cores and 52 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-2595X is the smarter buy today. Xeon w7-2595X is $3,344 cheaper on MSRP at $2,039 MSRP versus $5,383 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 170.3% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-2595X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 26 cores / 52 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 75F3 Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-2595X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
1080p
low	198 FPS	339 FPS
medium	161 FPS	312 FPS
high	130 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	214 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	288 FPS
medium	126 FPS	235 FPS
high	98 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	198 FPS
medium	61 FPS	161 FPS
high	47 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	108 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon w7-2595X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
1080p
low	507 FPS	683 FPS
medium	443 FPS	580 FPS
high	354 FPS	459 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	406 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	555 FPS
medium	373 FPS	484 FPS
high	308 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	328 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	327 FPS
medium	234 FPS	287 FPS
high	205 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	232 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon w7-2595X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
1080p
low	948 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	792 FPS	1219 FPS
high	734 FPS	1113 FPS
ultra	657 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	661 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	552 FPS	928 FPS
high	503 FPS	834 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	472 FPS	637 FPS
medium	374 FPS	540 FPS
high	330 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	410 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon w7-2595X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
1080p
low	1006 FPS	1124 FPS
medium	908 FPS	1007 FPS
high	782 FPS	881 FPS
ultra	679 FPS	783 FPS
1440p
low	770 FPS	865 FPS
medium	671 FPS	766 FPS
high	575 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	500 FPS	590 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	636 FPS
medium	495 FPS	566 FPS
high	435 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Xeon w7-2595X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and Xeon w7-2595X

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

Xeon w7-2595X

The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 2.4% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+23%	26 / 52
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+5%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+425%	48.75 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	64,505	66,049+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	48,442
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,436
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	21,758

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2595X — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200+63900%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	2048 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-2595X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-2595X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs true (Xeon w7-2595X). Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon w7-2595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2595X debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($5383 vs $2039), the Xeon w7-2595X is $3344 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Xeon w7-2595X the 92% better value option.