PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,984 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 75F3

2021

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,984 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 75F3?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 40.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 40.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $2,984 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $5,383 MSRP, and it gives you a 40.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 131.7% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 75F3 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	198 FPS	224 FPS
medium	161 FPS	184 FPS
high	130 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	194 FPS
medium	126 FPS	156 FPS
high	98 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	94 FPS
medium	61 FPS	81 FPS
high	47 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	51 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	507 FPS	806 FPS
medium	443 FPS	684 FPS
high	354 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	655 FPS
medium	373 FPS	569 FPS
high	308 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	383 FPS
medium	234 FPS	335 FPS
high	205 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	948 FPS	812 FPS
medium	792 FPS	680 FPS
high	734 FPS	620 FPS
ultra	657 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	661 FPS	622 FPS
medium	552 FPS	521 FPS
high	503 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	405 FPS
4K
low	472 FPS	451 FPS
medium	374 FPS	360 FPS
high	330 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	259 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	1006 FPS	1215 FPS
medium	908 FPS	1015 FPS
high	782 FPS	926 FPS
ultra	679 FPS	820 FPS
1440p
low	770 FPS	951 FPS
medium	671 FPS	828 FPS
high	575 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	500 FPS	611 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	674 FPS
medium	495 FPS	605 FPS
high	435 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.95 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 3.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.95 GHz	3.8 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	64,505	66,614+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	45,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	2048 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($5383 vs $2399), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $2984 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 79.4% better value option.