PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $958 less on MSRP ($4,425 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 75F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (63,692 vs 64,505).

EPYC 75F3

2021

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Why buy it

✅Costs $958 less on MSRP ($4,425 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 75F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (63,692 vs 64,505).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 75F3 better than EPYC 7702P?

Yes. EPYC 75F3 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 34.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 75F3 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 75F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7702P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 75F3 is 21.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,383 MSRP versus $4,425 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7702P is also 20.1% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 75F3 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 75F3 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7702P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	198 FPS	192 FPS
medium	161 FPS	172 FPS
high	130 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	157 FPS
medium	126 FPS	132 FPS
high	98 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	72 FPS
medium	61 FPS	65 FPS
high	47 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7702P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	507 FPS	247 FPS
medium	443 FPS	221 FPS
high	354 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	148 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	202 FPS
medium	373 FPS	186 FPS
high	308 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	124 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	126 FPS
medium	234 FPS	118 FPS
high	205 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	84 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7702P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	948 FPS	629 FPS
medium	792 FPS	536 FPS
high	734 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	657 FPS	415 FPS
1440p
low	661 FPS	524 FPS
medium	552 FPS	446 FPS
high	503 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	338 FPS
4K
low	472 FPS	389 FPS
medium	374 FPS	312 FPS
high	330 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	224 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7702P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	1006 FPS	904 FPS
medium	908 FPS	823 FPS
high	782 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	679 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	770 FPS	711 FPS
medium	671 FPS	620 FPS
high	575 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	500 FPS	450 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	503 FPS
medium	495 FPS	452 FPS
high	435 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	343 FPS

Open EPYC 75F3 Open EPYC 7702P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7702P

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7702P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7702P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 7702P's 63,692 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 75F3. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	64 / 128+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+19%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+48%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	64,505+1%	63,692

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7702P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7702P).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 7702P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the EPYC 7702P debuted at $4425. On MSRP ($5383 vs $4425), the EPYC 7702P is $958 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702P — making the EPYC 7702P the 18.3% better value option.