
EPYC 9655P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 81,000).
- ❌8.1% HIGHER MSRP$10,811 MSRPvs$9,999 MSRP
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $812 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9655P
2024Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $812 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 81,000).
- ❌8.1% HIGHER MSRP$10,811 MSRPvs$9,999 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than EPYC 9655P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 780 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 260 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 795 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1047 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| medium | 939 FPS | 997 FPS |
| high | 821 FPS | 874 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 771 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 11.5% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,287 vs 81,000 (107.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192 | 96 / 192 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+4% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total) | 384 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 160,490+12% | 143,017 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 148,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,287 | 81,000+234% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Workstation / Scientific Computing |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9655P launched at $10811 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($10811 vs $9999), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is $812 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the EPYC 9655P the 3.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10811 | $9999-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8+3% | 14.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











