PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 37,967).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,812 less on MSRP ($7,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9655P

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

2025

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,812 less on MSRP ($7,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 37,967).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX better than EPYC 9655P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 56.3% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better fit. You are getting 56.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is $2,812 cheaper on MSRP at $7,999 MSRP versus $10,811 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 30.0% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 14.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 96/192, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9655P Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	170 FPS	303 FPS
medium	143 FPS	281 FPS
high	122 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	268 FPS
medium	121 FPS	224 FPS
high	99 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	186 FPS
medium	73 FPS	155 FPS
high	57 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	105 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	696 FPS	803 FPS
medium	602 FPS	687 FPS
high	475 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	468 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	662 FPS
medium	501 FPS	590 FPS
high	414 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	386 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	370 FPS
medium	295 FPS	334 FPS
high	267 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	269 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	746 FPS	889 FPS
medium	633 FPS	728 FPS
high	589 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	693 FPS
medium	474 FPS	567 FPS
high	434 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	411 FPS	490 FPS
medium	331 FPS	407 FPS
high	299 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	1047 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	939 FPS	1014 FPS
high	821 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	744 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	839 FPS	890 FPS
medium	733 FPS	783 FPS
high	641 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	562 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	605 FPS	649 FPS
medium	539 FPS	579 FPS
high	477 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9655P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 154,361 points. Launch price was $7,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX's 154,361 — a 3.9% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,287 vs 37,967 (43.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+50%	64 / 128
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	5.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+50%	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	160,490+4%	154,361
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	120,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	3,644
Geekbench 6 Multi	24,287	37,967+56%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX).

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655P launched at $10811 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX debuted at $7999. On MSRP ($10811 vs $7999), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is $2812 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX the 26.1% better value option.