
EPYC 9655
Popular choices:

EPYC 9655P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9655
2024Why buy it
- ✅+20.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,041 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,329).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 9655
2024EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+20.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,041 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,329).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9655 better than EPYC 9655P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 235 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 589 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 411 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 238 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1047 FPS | 1047 FPS |
| medium | 939 FPS | 939 FPS |
| high | 821 FPS | 821 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 744 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 839 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 733 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 416 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and EPYC 9655P

EPYC 9655
EPYC 9655
The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9655 and EPYC 9655P share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the EPYC 9655P's 160,490 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 24,287 (18.8% advantage for the EPYC 9655). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192 | 96 / 192 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total) | 384 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 156,110 | 160,490+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,830 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,329+21% | 24,287 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9655 supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and SP5 (EPYC 9655P).
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+50% | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655P debuted at $10811. On MSRP ($11852 vs $10811), the EPYC 9655P is $1041 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 14.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655P — making the EPYC 9655P the 11.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11852 | $10811-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.2 | 14.8+12% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












