EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9655P

AMD

EPYC 9655

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9655P

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

  • +20.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,041 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
  • Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,329).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than EPYC 9655P?
Yes. EPYC 9655 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting 20.8% better Geekbench multi-core and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 20.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9655 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9655P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9655 is 9.6% more expensive on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $10,811 MSRP, and it gives you 2.8% higher PassMark. EPYC 9655P is also 12.7% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 96/192 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
1080p
low170 FPS170 FPS
medium143 FPS143 FPS
high122 FPS122 FPS
ultra99 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS149 FPS
medium121 FPS121 FPS
high99 FPS99 FPS
ultra83 FPS83 FPS
4K
low83 FPS83 FPS
medium73 FPS73 FPS
high57 FPS57 FPS
ultra47 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
1080p
low696 FPS696 FPS
medium602 FPS602 FPS
high475 FPS475 FPS
ultra411 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low566 FPS566 FPS
medium501 FPS501 FPS
high414 FPS414 FPS
ultra336 FPS336 FPS
4K
low331 FPS331 FPS
medium295 FPS295 FPS
high267 FPS267 FPS
ultra235 FPS235 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
1080p
low746 FPS746 FPS
medium633 FPS633 FPS
high589 FPS589 FPS
ultra519 FPS519 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS561 FPS
medium474 FPS474 FPS
high434 FPS434 FPS
ultra376 FPS376 FPS
4K
low411 FPS411 FPS
medium331 FPS331 FPS
high299 FPS299 FPS
ultra238 FPS238 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
1080p
low1047 FPS1047 FPS
medium939 FPS939 FPS
high821 FPS821 FPS
ultra744 FPS744 FPS
1440p
low839 FPS839 FPS
medium733 FPS733 FPS
high641 FPS641 FPS
ultra562 FPS562 FPS
4K
low605 FPS605 FPS
medium539 FPS539 FPS
high477 FPS477 FPS
ultra416 FPS416 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and EPYC 9655P

AMD

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

AMD

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9655 and EPYC 9655P share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the EPYC 9655P's 160,490 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 24,287 (18.8% advantage for the EPYC 9655). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
Cores / Threads
96 / 192
96 / 192
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
384 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
156,110
160,490+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,830
Geekbench 6 Multi
29,329+21%
24,287
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9655 supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and SP5 (EPYC 9655P).

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
9 TB+50%
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center
Data Center / Single Socket
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655P debuted at $10811. On MSRP ($11852 vs $10811), the EPYC 9655P is $1041 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 14.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655P — making the EPYC 9655P the 11.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9655P
MSRP
$11852
$10811-9%
Performance per Dollar
13.2
14.8+12%
Release Date
2024
2024