EPYC 9655 vs EPYC 9755

AMD

EPYC 9655

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9755

128 Cores256 Thrd500 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,132 less on MSRP ($11,852 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
  • Draws 400W instead of 500W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,300 vs 29,329).
  • 9.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $12,984 MSRPvs$11,852 MSRP
  • 25% higher power demand at 500W vs 400W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than EPYC 9755?
Yes. EPYC 9655 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 11.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9655 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9655 is $1,132 cheaper on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $12,984 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.8% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 128/256 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
1080p
low170 FPS170 FPS
medium143 FPS141 FPS
high122 FPS120 FPS
ultra99 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS148 FPS
medium121 FPS119 FPS
high99 FPS95 FPS
ultra83 FPS76 FPS
4K
low83 FPS69 FPS
medium73 FPS59 FPS
high57 FPS47 FPS
ultra47 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
1080p
low696 FPS581 FPS
medium602 FPS510 FPS
high475 FPS414 FPS
ultra411 FPS361 FPS
1440p
low566 FPS489 FPS
medium501 FPS437 FPS
high414 FPS365 FPS
ultra336 FPS302 FPS
4K
low331 FPS304 FPS
medium295 FPS275 FPS
high267 FPS247 FPS
ultra235 FPS221 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
1080p
low746 FPS741 FPS
medium633 FPS632 FPS
high589 FPS574 FPS
ultra519 FPS505 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS558 FPS
medium474 FPS473 FPS
high434 FPS423 FPS
ultra376 FPS366 FPS
4K
low411 FPS403 FPS
medium331 FPS324 FPS
high299 FPS286 FPS
ultra238 FPS229 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
1080p
low1047 FPS915 FPS
medium939 FPS830 FPS
high821 FPS715 FPS
ultra744 FPS632 FPS
1440p
low839 FPS726 FPS
medium733 FPS633 FPS
high641 FPS542 FPS
ultra562 FPS469 FPS
4K
low605 FPS524 FPS
medium539 FPS468 FPS
high477 FPS411 FPS
ultra416 FPS352 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and EPYC 9755

AMD

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

AMD

EPYC 9755

The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9755 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the EPYC 9755's 166,328 — a 6.3% lead for the EPYC 9755. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,830 vs 2,800, a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9655 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 29,300 (0.1% advantage for the EPYC 9655). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655 vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
Cores / Threads
96 / 192
128 / 256+33%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+10%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
512 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
156,110
166,328+7%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,830+1%
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
29,329
29,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 9 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and SP5 (EPYC 9755).

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
9 TB
9 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center
Data Center / Cloud Computing
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the EPYC 9755 debuted at $12984. On MSRP ($11852 vs $12984), the EPYC 9655 is $1132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9755 — making the EPYC 9655 the 2.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9655EPYC 9755
MSRP
$11852-9%
$12984
Performance per Dollar
13.2+3%
12.8
Release Date
2024
2024