
EPYC 9655
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9655
2024Why buy it
- ✅+12.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,853 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (26,000 vs 29,329).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
EPYC 9655
2024Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+12.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,853 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (26,000 vs 29,329).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9655 better than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 889 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1047 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 939 FPS | 1014 FPS |
| high | 821 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 688 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9655
EPYC 9655
The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.


Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,949 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9655 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9655 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9655 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X's 135,949 — a 13.8% lead for the EPYC 9655. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,830 vs 3,050, a 7.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 26,000 (12% advantage for the EPYC 9655). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655 vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X.
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+50% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+50% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 156,110+15% | 135,949 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 98,427 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,830 | 3,050+8% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,329+13% | 26,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9655 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 196.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9655) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) — the EPYC 9655 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X).
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+800% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X). Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, Ryzen Threadripper 7980X targets High-end Desktop / Content Creation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper 7980X rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center | High-end Desktop / Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X debuted at $4999. On MSRP ($11852 vs $4999), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is $6853 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 27.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X the 69.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11852 | $4999-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.2 | 27.2+106% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











