PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,300 vs 30,170).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,285 less on MSRP ($11,699 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9755

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

2025

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 384 MB).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,285 less on MSRP ($11,699 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,300 vs 30,170).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than EPYC 9755?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 25.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3% better Geekbench multi-core, 6.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better fit. You are getting 3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is $1,285 cheaper on MSRP at $11,699 MSRP versus $12,984 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 17.6% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 128/256, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9755 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	170 FPS	300 FPS
medium	141 FPS	279 FPS
high	120 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	194 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	266 FPS
medium	119 FPS	223 FPS
high	95 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	184 FPS
medium	59 FPS	154 FPS
high	47 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	104 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	581 FPS	785 FPS
medium	510 FPS	675 FPS
high	414 FPS	531 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	655 FPS
medium	437 FPS	584 FPS
high	365 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	377 FPS
4K
low	304 FPS	366 FPS
medium	275 FPS	331 FPS
high	247 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	263 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	741 FPS	887 FPS
medium	632 FPS	726 FPS
high	574 FPS	653 FPS
ultra	505 FPS	555 FPS
1440p
low	558 FPS	692 FPS
medium	473 FPS	566 FPS
high	423 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	418 FPS
4K
low	403 FPS	488 FPS
medium	324 FPS	405 FPS
high	286 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	302 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	915 FPS	1115 FPS
medium	830 FPS	1001 FPS
high	715 FPS	877 FPS
ultra	632 FPS	789 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	878 FPS
medium	633 FPS	773 FPS
high	542 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	469 FPS	589 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	641 FPS
medium	468 FPS	571 FPS
high	411 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9755 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

EPYC 9755

The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9755 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 27.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9755 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9755 scores 166,328 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 5.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 3,000, a 6.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,300 vs 30,170 (2.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755 vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+33%	96 / 192
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.4 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+8%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+33%	384 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	166,328	176,281+6%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	180,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	3,000+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,300	30,170+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9755 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 198.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9755) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9755) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+350%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9755) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Computing	High-end Workstation / AI Rendering

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9755 launched at $12984 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX debuted at $11699. On MSRP ($12984 vs $11699), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is $1285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9755 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX the 16.2% better value option.