PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

✅+12.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,985 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 112.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (26,000 vs 29,300).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9755

2024

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

2023

Why buy it

✅+12.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,985 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 112.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (26,000 vs 29,300).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7980X better than EPYC 9755?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is ahead with a 26.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9755 pulls ahead with 12.7% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9755 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9755 is the better fit. You are getting 12.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is $7,985 cheaper on MSRP at $4,999 MSRP versus $12,984 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9755 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 12.7% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 112.3% better value on MSRP (27.2 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9755 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 100% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 64/128. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9755 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
1080p
low	170 FPS	302 FPS
medium	141 FPS	279 FPS
high	120 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	268 FPS
medium	119 FPS	223 FPS
high	95 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	185 FPS
medium	59 FPS	154 FPS
high	47 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	104 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
1080p
low	581 FPS	787 FPS
medium	510 FPS	672 FPS
high	414 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	649 FPS
medium	437 FPS	577 FPS
high	365 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	380 FPS
4K
low	304 FPS	363 FPS
medium	275 FPS	327 FPS
high	247 FPS	302 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
1080p
low	741 FPS	889 FPS
medium	632 FPS	728 FPS
high	574 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	505 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	558 FPS	693 FPS
medium	473 FPS	567 FPS
high	423 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	403 FPS	490 FPS
medium	324 FPS	407 FPS
high	286 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
1080p
low	915 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	830 FPS	1014 FPS
high	715 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	632 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	890 FPS
medium	633 FPS	783 FPS
high	542 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	469 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	649 FPS
medium	468 FPS	579 FPS
high	411 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9755 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9755

The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,949 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9755 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9755 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9755 scores 166,328 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X's 135,949 — a 20.1% lead for the EPYC 9755. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 3,050, a 8.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,300 vs 26,000 (11.9% advantage for the EPYC 9755). L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755 vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X.

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+100%	64 / 128
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.2 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+100%	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	166,328+22%	135,949
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	98,427
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	3,050+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,300+13%	26,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9755 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 196.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9755) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9755) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) — the EPYC 9755 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9755) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X).

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+800%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	12+200%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9755) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X). Primary use case: EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, Ryzen Threadripper 7980X targets High-end Desktop / Content Creation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper 7980X rivals Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Computing	High-end Desktop / Content Creation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9755 launched at $12984 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X debuted at $4999. On MSRP ($12984 vs $4999), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is $7985 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9755 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 27.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X the 71.9% better value option.