
EPYC 9655P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 28,666).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,812 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
EPYC 9655P
2024Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,812 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 28,666).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9980X better than EPYC 9655P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 105 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 803 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 269 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 889 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1047 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 939 FPS | 1014 FPS |
| high | 821 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 688 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.


Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 142,069 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X's 142,069 — a 12.2% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,287 vs 28,666 (16.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+50% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+50% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 160,490+13% | 142,069 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 115,098 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,220 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,287 | 28,666+18% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9655P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9655P) vs 80 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X) — the EPYC 9655P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and sTR5,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X).
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper 9980X targets HEDT / Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper 9980X rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | HEDT / Enthusiast Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9655P launched at $10811 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X debuted at $4999. On MSRP ($10811 vs $4999), the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is $5812 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X the 62.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10811 | $4999-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 28.4+92% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











