
EPYC 9555P
Popular choices:

EPYC 9655P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+21.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $2,828 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,406).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
EPYC 9555P
2024EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+21.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $2,828 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 29,406).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9655P better than EPYC 9555P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 235 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 589 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 411 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 238 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 1047 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 939 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 821 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 744 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 839 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 733 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 416 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and EPYC 9655P

EPYC 9555P
EPYC 9555P
The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.

EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9655P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P — a 2.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the EPYC 9655P's 160,490 — a 16.9% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 24,287 (19.1% advantage for the EPYC 9555P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 192+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 135,441 | 160,490+18% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,406+21% | 24,287 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and SP5 (EPYC 9655P).
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655P debuted at $10811. On MSRP ($7983 vs $10811), the EPYC 9555P is $2828 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 14.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655P — making the EPYC 9555P the 13.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | EPYC 9655P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7983-26% | $10811 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0+15% | 14.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













