PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 81,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2023

Why buy it

✅+176.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $1,792 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Why buy it

✅+176.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $1,792 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 81,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than EPYC 9575F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9575F is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX pulls ahead with 176.4% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better fit. You are getting 176.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is $1,792 cheaper on MSRP at $9,999 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it gives you 176.4% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that EPYC 9575F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.2% better value on MSRP (14.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	303 FPS	304 FPS
medium	280 FPS	288 FPS
high	232 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	194 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	272 FPS
medium	223 FPS	233 FPS
high	172 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	188 FPS
medium	154 FPS	160 FPS
high	118 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	109 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	797 FPS	780 FPS
medium	681 FPS	676 FPS
high	536 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	470 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	648 FPS
medium	585 FPS	578 FPS
high	475 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	360 FPS
medium	332 FPS	324 FPS
high	306 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	260 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	884 FPS	795 FPS
medium	721 FPS	667 FPS
high	652 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	704 FPS
medium	560 FPS	593 FPS
high	494 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	436 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	495 FPS
medium	404 FPS	420 FPS
high	359 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	317 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	1118 FPS	1122 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	997 FPS
high	884 FPS	874 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	771 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	924 FPS
medium	778 FPS	801 FPS
high	683 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	614 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	674 FPS
medium	575 FPS	598 FPS
high	511 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 81,000 (93.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	96 / 192+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+32%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	147,718+3%	143,017
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	148,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,100
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308	81,000+176%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Workstation / Scientific Computing

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($11791 vs $9999), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is $1792 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX the 13.2% better value option.