PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 37,967).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,792 less on MSRP ($7,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,792 less on MSRP ($7,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 37,967).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX better than EPYC 9575F?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 29.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 4.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better fit. You are getting 29.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is $3,792 cheaper on MSRP at $7,999 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 54.0% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	303 FPS	303 FPS
medium	280 FPS	281 FPS
high	232 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	268 FPS
medium	223 FPS	224 FPS
high	172 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	186 FPS
medium	154 FPS	155 FPS
high	118 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	105 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	797 FPS	803 FPS
medium	681 FPS	687 FPS
high	536 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	468 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	662 FPS
medium	585 FPS	590 FPS
high	475 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	386 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	370 FPS
medium	332 FPS	334 FPS
high	306 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	269 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	884 FPS	889 FPS
medium	721 FPS	728 FPS
high	652 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	693 FPS
medium	560 FPS	567 FPS
high	494 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	490 FPS
medium	404 FPS	407 FPS
high	359 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	1118 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	1014 FPS
high	884 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	890 FPS
medium	778 FPS	783 FPS
high	683 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	649 FPS
medium	575 FPS	579 FPS
high	511 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 154,361 points. Launch price was $7,999.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX's 154,361 — a 4.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 37,967 (25.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	147,718	154,361+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	120,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	3,644
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308	37,967+30%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX debuted at $7999. On MSRP ($11791 vs $7999), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is $3792 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX the 42.5% better value option.