PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅+18.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,442 less on MSRP ($7,349 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,780 vs 29,308).

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅+18.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,442 less on MSRP ($7,349 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,780 vs 29,308).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX better than EPYC 9575F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is ahead with 2% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F pulls ahead with 18.3% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 18.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is $4,442 cheaper on MSRP at $7,349 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it gives you 2% higher max boost clock. The trade-off is that EPYC 9575F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 18.3% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 44.6% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	303 FPS	302 FPS
medium	280 FPS	279 FPS
high	232 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	268 FPS
medium	223 FPS	223 FPS
high	172 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	185 FPS
medium	154 FPS	154 FPS
high	118 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	104 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	797 FPS	787 FPS
medium	681 FPS	672 FPS
high	536 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	649 FPS
medium	585 FPS	577 FPS
high	475 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	380 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	363 FPS
medium	332 FPS	327 FPS
high	306 FPS	302 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	884 FPS	889 FPS
medium	721 FPS	728 FPS
high	652 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	693 FPS
medium	560 FPS	567 FPS
high	494 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	490 FPS
medium	404 FPS	407 FPS
high	359 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	1118 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	1014 FPS
high	884 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	890 FPS
medium	778 FPS	783 FPS
high	683 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	649 FPS
medium	575 FPS	579 FPS
high	511 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 — a 10.4% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 24,780 (16.7% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	147,718+11%	133,149
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	100,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,599
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+18%	24,780

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX debuted at $7349. On MSRP ($11791 vs $7349), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is $4442 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX the 36.5% better value option.