PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,340 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 44,869).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3475X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅+189.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,340 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+189.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 44,869).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3475X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon w9-3475X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X pulls ahead with 189.5% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX also has the bigger cache pool with 55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X is the better fit. You are getting 189.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1,340 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $3,739 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon w9-3475X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 189.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 59.5% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3475X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Xeon w9-3475X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
1080p
low	224 FPS	316 FPS
medium	184 FPS	306 FPS
high	156 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	207 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	274 FPS
medium	156 FPS	237 FPS
high	126 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	94 FPS	186 FPS
medium	81 FPS	159 FPS
high	63 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	108 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w9-3475X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
1080p
low	806 FPS	384 FPS
medium	684 FPS	332 FPS
high	535 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	655 FPS	308 FPS
medium	569 FPS	273 FPS
high	465 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	383 FPS	181 FPS
medium	335 FPS	162 FPS
high	300 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	133 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w9-3475X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
1080p
low	812 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	680 FPS	1086 FPS
high	620 FPS	1020 FPS
ultra	540 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	622 FPS	1009 FPS
medium	521 FPS	913 FPS
high	470 FPS	839 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	451 FPS	605 FPS
medium	360 FPS	521 FPS
high	326 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	400 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w9-3475X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
1080p
low	1215 FPS	1304 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	1015 FPS
high	926 FPS	1002 FPS
ultra	820 FPS	866 FPS
1440p
low	951 FPS	1061 FPS
medium	828 FPS	918 FPS
high	715 FPS	800 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	674 FPS	784 FPS
medium	605 FPS	685 FPS
high	529 FPS	583 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w9-3475X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon w9-3475X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 1,814, a 15.7% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 44,869 (97.3% advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	36 / 72+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB+55%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	66,614+2%	65,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	45,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	1,814+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	44,869+189%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3475X — the Xeon w9-3475X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3475X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w9-3475X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Professional Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3475X debuted at $3739. On MSRP ($2399 vs $3739), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1340 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 45.9% better value option.