PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $882 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 57.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.8 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 66,614).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 8434P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $882 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 57.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.8 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 66,614).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 8434P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 8434P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 39.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 39.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8434P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 58.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $1,517 MSRP, and it gives you a 39.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8434P is also 57.8% better value on MSRP (43.8 vs 27.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8434P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8434P Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	159 FPS	224 FPS
medium	131 FPS	184 FPS
high	110 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	194 FPS
medium	114 FPS	156 FPS
high	90 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	94 FPS
medium	58 FPS	81 FPS
high	45 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	51 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	419 FPS	806 FPS
medium	369 FPS	684 FPS
high	300 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	236 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	344 FPS	655 FPS
medium	311 FPS	569 FPS
high	260 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	212 FPS	383 FPS
medium	195 FPS	335 FPS
high	163 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	860 FPS	812 FPS
medium	786 FPS	680 FPS
high	760 FPS	620 FPS
ultra	682 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	622 FPS
medium	587 FPS	521 FPS
high	558 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	498 FPS	405 FPS
4K
low	435 FPS	451 FPS
medium	344 FPS	360 FPS
high	307 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	259 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	1023 FPS	1215 FPS
medium	913 FPS	1015 FPS
high	772 FPS	926 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	820 FPS
1440p
low	833 FPS	951 FPS
medium	712 FPS	828 FPS
high	598 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	611 FPS
4K
low	600 FPS	674 FPS
medium	524 FPS	605 FPS
high	451 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+100%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.5 GHz+45%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	128 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	66,490	66,614
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	45,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1152 — 56% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket	SP6	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	1152	2048 GB+186413411%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	128+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8434P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($1517 vs $2399), the EPYC 8434P is $882 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the EPYC 8434P the 44.9% better value option.