EPYC 8434P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 8434P

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 67,561).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,088 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
  • Delivers 259.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
  • 75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 8434P?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 26.5% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.5% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $1,088 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $1,517 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.5% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 259.3% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 43.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 48/96. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low159 FPS297 FPS
medium131 FPS270 FPS
high110 FPS223 FPS
ultra87 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS273 FPS
medium114 FPS224 FPS
high90 FPS174 FPS
ultra72 FPS153 FPS
4K
low68 FPS187 FPS
medium58 FPS154 FPS
high45 FPS118 FPS
ultra37 FPS104 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low419 FPS786 FPS
medium369 FPS643 FPS
high300 FPS477 FPS
ultra236 FPS403 FPS
1440p
low344 FPS647 FPS
medium311 FPS549 FPS
high260 FPS422 FPS
ultra199 FPS328 FPS
4K
low212 FPS363 FPS
medium195 FPS312 FPS
high163 FPS273 FPS
ultra132 FPS230 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low860 FPS888 FPS
medium786 FPS705 FPS
high760 FPS622 FPS
ultra682 FPS534 FPS
1440p
low663 FPS713 FPS
medium587 FPS567 FPS
high558 FPS489 FPS
ultra498 FPS414 FPS
4K
low435 FPS507 FPS
medium344 FPS418 FPS
high307 FPS375 FPS
ultra250 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low1023 FPS1106 FPS
medium913 FPS991 FPS
high772 FPS867 FPS
ultra651 FPS781 FPS
1440p
low833 FPS860 FPS
medium712 FPS759 FPS
high598 FPS664 FPS
ultra492 FPS576 FPS
4K
low600 FPS632 FPS
medium524 FPS562 FPS
high451 FPS496 FPS
ultra376 FPS429 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Processing Power

The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

FeatureEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads
48 / 96+200%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
5.4 GHz+74%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4.5 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
66,490
67,561+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
40,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,016
Geekbench 6 Multi
23,596
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1152 56% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

FeatureEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket
SP6
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+95900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
1152
2048 GB+186413411%
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
96
128+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

FeatureEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($1517 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $1088 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 112.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 8434PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP
$1517
$429-72%
Performance per Dollar
43.8
157.5+260%
Release Date
2023
2025