EPYC 8434P vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8434P

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 8434P

48 / 96

66,490

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 / 104

68,385

+2.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 68,385).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $918 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Delivers 160.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $918 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Delivers 160.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 68,385).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than EPYC 8434P?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the smarter buy today. Xeon Platinum 8571N is $918 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $1,517 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 160.5% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 43.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 48/96. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8434P Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8571N Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	159 FPS	188 FPS
medium	131 FPS	165 FPS
high	110 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	155 FPS
medium	114 FPS	131 FPS
high	90 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	70 FPS
medium	58 FPS	63 FPS
high	45 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	419 FPS	515 FPS
medium	369 FPS	456 FPS
high	300 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	236 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	344 FPS	421 FPS
medium	311 FPS	379 FPS
high	260 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	212 FPS	259 FPS
medium	195 FPS	237 FPS
high	163 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	174 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	860 FPS	910 FPS
medium	786 FPS	838 FPS
high	760 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	682 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	782 FPS
medium	587 FPS	716 FPS
high	558 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	498 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	435 FPS	528 FPS
medium	344 FPS	444 FPS
high	307 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	1023 FPS	1036 FPS
medium	913 FPS	917 FPS
high	772 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	674 FPS
1440p
low	833 FPS	849 FPS
medium	712 FPS	727 FPS
high	598 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	600 FPS	617 FPS
medium	524 FPS	541 FPS
high	451 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	404 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and Xeon Platinum 8571N

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	52 / 104+8%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+134%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	66,490	68,385+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	60,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the EPYC 8434P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800+95900%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096 GB+372826922%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+20%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. On MSRP ($1517 vs $599), the Xeon Platinum 8571N is $918 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 89% better value option.