PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 325W, a 45W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 17,120).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3555 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w7-3555

2024

Why buy it

✅+10.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,749 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
❌16.1% higher power demand at 325W vs 280W.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Xeon w7-3555

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 325W, a 45W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+10.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 17,120).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3555 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,749 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
❌16.1% higher power demand at 325W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon w7-3555?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 18.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3555 pulls ahead with 10.5% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX also has the bigger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3555 is the better fit. You are getting 10.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $350 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $2,749 MSRP, and it gives you a 18.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon w7-3555 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 10.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 12.7% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3555 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-3555 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
1080p
low	224 FPS	311 FPS
medium	184 FPS	301 FPS
high	156 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	270 FPS
medium	156 FPS	233 FPS
high	126 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	94 FPS	184 FPS
medium	81 FPS	157 FPS
high	63 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	106 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w7-3555

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
1080p
low	806 FPS	682 FPS
medium	684 FPS	593 FPS
high	535 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	655 FPS	551 FPS
medium	569 FPS	489 FPS
high	465 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	383 FPS	324 FPS
medium	335 FPS	288 FPS
high	300 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	234 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w7-3555

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
1080p
low	812 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	680 FPS	1057 FPS
high	620 FPS	974 FPS
ultra	540 FPS	834 FPS
1440p
low	622 FPS	1001 FPS
medium	521 FPS	888 FPS
high	470 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	451 FPS	600 FPS
medium	360 FPS	517 FPS
high	326 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	397 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w7-3555

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
1080p
low	1215 FPS	1212 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	1015 FPS
high	926 FPS	925 FPS
ultra	820 FPS	809 FPS
1440p
low	951 FPS	980 FPS
medium	828 FPS	845 FPS
high	715 FPS	736 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	635 FPS
4K
low	674 FPS	727 FPS
medium	605 FPS	632 FPS
high	529 FPS	557 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon w7-3555

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon w7-3555

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon w7-3555

The Xeon w7-3555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 325 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 67,754 points. Launch price was $2,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-3555 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon w7-3555 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3555 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3555 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon w7-3555's 67,754 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon w7-3555. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 2,300, a 39% lead for the Xeon w7-3555 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 17,120 (9.9% advantage for the Xeon w7-3555). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3555.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB+71%	75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	66,614	67,754+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	45,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	2,300+48%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	17,120+10%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3555 — the Xeon w7-3555 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3555 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3555) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and W790 (Xeon w7-3555).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3555 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs true (Xeon w7-3555). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon w7-3555 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w7-3555
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Professional Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3555 debuted at $2749. On MSRP ($2399 vs $2749), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3555 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 11.9% better value option.