PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 61.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (66,614 vs 68,643).
❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅+3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 61.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (66,614 vs 68,643).
❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 46.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the better fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1,596 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $3,995 MSRP, and it gives you a 46.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8352Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3% better PassMark. It is also 61.6% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8352Y Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	224 FPS	189 FPS
medium	184 FPS	152 FPS
high	156 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	154 FPS
medium	156 FPS	120 FPS
high	126 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	94 FPS	72 FPS
medium	81 FPS	60 FPS
high	63 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	806 FPS	233 FPS
medium	684 FPS	208 FPS
high	535 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	655 FPS	199 FPS
medium	569 FPS	181 FPS
high	465 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	383 FPS	124 FPS
medium	335 FPS	115 FPS
high	300 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	82 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	812 FPS	969 FPS
medium	680 FPS	848 FPS
high	620 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	540 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	622 FPS	775 FPS
medium	521 FPS	669 FPS
high	470 FPS	632 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	561 FPS
4K
low	451 FPS	498 FPS
medium	360 FPS	393 FPS
high	326 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	285 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	1215 FPS	893 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	811 FPS
high	926 FPS	697 FPS
ultra	820 FPS	599 FPS
1440p
low	951 FPS	699 FPS
medium	828 FPS	613 FPS
high	715 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	449 FPS
4K
low	674 FPS	504 FPS
medium	605 FPS	451 FPS
high	529 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	343 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is built on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+32%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB+167%	48 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	—
PassMark	66,614	68,643+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	45,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+52428700%	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y debuted at $3995. On MSRP ($2399 vs $3995), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1596 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 47.1% better value option.