PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+287.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 311.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+287.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 311.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 39.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N pulls ahead with 287.1% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8571N also has the bigger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better fit. You are getting 287.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the smarter buy today. Xeon Platinum 8571N is $1,800 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,399 MSRP, and it gives you 287.1% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 39.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 311.1% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB), more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8571N Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	224 FPS	188 FPS
medium	184 FPS	165 FPS
high	156 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	155 FPS
medium	156 FPS	131 FPS
high	126 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	94 FPS	70 FPS
medium	81 FPS	63 FPS
high	63 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	806 FPS	515 FPS
medium	684 FPS	456 FPS
high	535 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	655 FPS	421 FPS
medium	569 FPS	379 FPS
high	465 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	383 FPS	259 FPS
medium	335 FPS	237 FPS
high	300 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	812 FPS	910 FPS
medium	680 FPS	838 FPS
high	620 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	540 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	622 FPS	782 FPS
medium	521 FPS	716 FPS
high	470 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	451 FPS	528 FPS
medium	360 FPS	444 FPS
high	326 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	330 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	1215 FPS	1036 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	917 FPS
high	926 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	820 FPS	674 FPS
1440p
low	951 FPS	849 FPS
medium	828 FPS	727 FPS
high	715 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	674 FPS	617 FPS
medium	605 FPS	541 FPS
high	529 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	404 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon Platinum 8571N

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 1,961, a 23.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 60,000 (117.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	52 / 104+117%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+13%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB	300 MB (total)+134%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	66,614	68,385+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	45,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	1,961+27%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	60,000+287%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Workstation	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. On MSRP ($2399 vs $599), the Xeon Platinum 8571N is $1800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 121.7% better value option.