PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,610 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 176.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (79,889 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅+5.2% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,610 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 176.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+5.2% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (79,889 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3990X better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is ahead with a 16.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ pulls ahead with 5.2% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8592+ also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better fit. You are getting 5.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $7,610 cheaper on MSRP at $3,990 MSRP versus $11,600 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8592+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 5.2% better PassMark. It is also 176.5% better value on MSRP (20.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8592+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	181 FPS	188 FPS
medium	152 FPS	165 FPS
high	131 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	155 FPS
medium	125 FPS	131 FPS
high	102 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	70 FPS
medium	72 FPS	63 FPS
high	57 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	584 FPS	277 FPS
medium	503 FPS	246 FPS
high	386 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	167 FPS
1440p
low	491 FPS	230 FPS
medium	433 FPS	208 FPS
high	343 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	308 FPS	143 FPS
medium	275 FPS	131 FPS
high	235 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	99 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	681 FPS	849 FPS
medium	563 FPS	768 FPS
high	497 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	428 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	582 FPS	737 FPS
medium	488 FPS	662 FPS
high	427 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	493 FPS
medium	338 FPS	402 FPS
high	293 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	942 FPS	938 FPS
medium	842 FPS	849 FPS
high	724 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	639 FPS	633 FPS
1440p
low	777 FPS	776 FPS
medium	677 FPS	677 FPS
high	580 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	502 FPS	497 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	559 FPS
medium	489 FPS	501 FPS
high	429 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	383 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon Platinum 8592+

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon Platinum 8592+ share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X scores 79,889 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+10%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+53%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB	320 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	79,889	84,013+5%
Cinebench R23 Multi	64,366	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	22,045	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8592+). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	5600+139900%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+6553500%	4096
RAM Channels	4	8+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+10%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X launched at $3990 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($3990 vs $11600), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $7610 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 93.7% better value option.