
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6740E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+4.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,275 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 79,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+4.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,275 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 79,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6740E better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 584 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 491 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 831 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 942 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 842 FPS | 830 FPS |
| high | 724 FPS | 715 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 777 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 677 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 344 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon 6740E


Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Xeon 6740E
Xeon 6740E
The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X scores 79,889 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 4.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+34% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+21% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+167% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 79,889+5% | 76,167 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,366 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,045 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E — the Xeon 6740E supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6740E supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 8 (Xeon 6740E). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 6400+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6553500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6740E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X launched at $3990 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740E debuted at $5265. On MSRP ($3990 vs $5265), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $1275 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 32.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3990-24% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.0+38% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












