EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

AMD

EPYC 9374F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
  • 45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $860 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
  • Delivers 18.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
  • Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (79,889 vs 82,009).
  • Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?
Yes. EPYC 9374F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 21.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9374F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 21.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9374F is the better fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9374F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 3990X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9374F is 21.6% more expensive on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $3,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 21.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is also 18.4% better value on MSRP (20.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9374F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
1080p
low218 FPS181 FPS
medium180 FPS152 FPS
high154 FPS131 FPS
ultra111 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low191 FPS157 FPS
medium152 FPS125 FPS
high125 FPS102 FPS
ultra92 FPS83 FPS
4K
low88 FPS85 FPS
medium75 FPS72 FPS
high59 FPS57 FPS
ultra48 FPS46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
1080p
low637 FPS584 FPS
medium556 FPS503 FPS
high449 FPS386 FPS
ultra392 FPS330 FPS
1440p
low538 FPS491 FPS
medium478 FPS433 FPS
high397 FPS343 FPS
ultra327 FPS277 FPS
4K
low334 FPS308 FPS
medium300 FPS275 FPS
high269 FPS235 FPS
ultra240 FPS204 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
1080p
low817 FPS681 FPS
medium690 FPS563 FPS
high624 FPS497 FPS
ultra545 FPS428 FPS
1440p
low616 FPS582 FPS
medium518 FPS488 FPS
high461 FPS427 FPS
ultra395 FPS368 FPS
4K
low441 FPS424 FPS
medium352 FPS338 FPS
high310 FPS293 FPS
ultra247 FPS234 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
1080p
low1138 FPS942 FPS
medium1015 FPS842 FPS
high875 FPS724 FPS
ultra784 FPS639 FPS
1440p
low880 FPS777 FPS
medium774 FPS677 FPS
high654 FPS580 FPS
ultra570 FPS502 FPS
4K
low623 FPS540 FPS
medium564 FPS489 FPS
high488 FPS429 FPS
ultra425 FPS373 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

AMD

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9374F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
64 / 128+100%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.85 GHz+33%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
82,009+3%
79,889
Cinebench R23 Multi
64,366
Geekbench 6 Single
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
22,045
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — the EPYC 9374F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 GB 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) — the EPYC 9374F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Socket
SP5
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+119900%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144
256 GB+4368967%
RAM Channels
12+200%
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+45%
88
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
true
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9374F launched at $4850 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X debuted at $3990. On MSRP ($4850 vs $3990), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $860 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 16.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9374FRyzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP
$4850
$3990-18%
Performance per Dollar
16.9
20.0+18%
Release Date
2022
2019